5 ms·
There's no implication that you give up your copyrights to apple. They won't allow you to sell iBooks elsewhere, that's it. It's not exactly pro-open market but
by zerostar07 15y ago
There's no implication that you give up your copyrights to apple. They won't allow you to sell iBooks elsewhere, that's it. It's not exactly pro-open market but that's Apple: musicians and app developers already knuckle under.
The real disturbing part is this: Apple censors worse than China, and books tend to be provocative, a lot more than music or apps. They essentially want to act as a publisher too, but without taking any risks on the part of authors. I sincerely hope for good literature that ibooks ends to be a flop.
In any case the problem will be solved with 3rd party tools that take an iBook and convert it to (swf|html|exe) that people can sell anywhere they want. Surely apple cannot claim that the output of a conversion program belongs to them as well. Although it would be interesting to see how they react when the first ibook-to-iOS App converter appears.
- technoslut 15y ago> The real disturbing part is this: Apple censors worse than China, and books tend to be provocative, a lot more than music or apps. They essentially want to act as a publisher too, but without taking any risks on the part of authors. The rules may stipulate this but I don't think it's Apple's intent. If that was their intent they would never have control of the music and movie marketplace. Yes, certain books have been previously banned from apps but that was more about engineers not getting fired. The app store model is still fairly new and Apple is still learning, even with books that existed 1,000 years ago. I think they want to be open while protecting kids. That is a very fine line.