4 ms·
To be fair, whether or not you understand SQL, it does integrate spectacularly poorly with most programming languages. Sure you can use ORM, but a massive cost
by marginalia_nu 4y ago
To be fair, whether or not you understand SQL, it does integrate spectacularly poorly with most programming languages. Sure you can use ORM, but a massive cost of capability and performance.
Database rows simply aren't objects. You have to squint so hard you risk retinal detachment before the two are even a little bit the same.
Other database paradigms exist, and have existed for a long time. File systems spring to mind. The Windows registry is another.
A case can at least be constructed for using something other than a relational database if all you want is to persist objects in a consistent manner.