4 ms·
1) I don't. However, I know that if I can see the answer in a Google result I can interpret the veracity in a way that ChatGPT can't. 2) Training doesn't neces
by cactusplant7374 4y ago
1) I don't. However, I know that if I can see the answer in a Google result I can interpret the veracity in a way that ChatGPT can't.
2) Training doesn't necessarily mean the correct output that matches the Google result.
- Terretta 4y agoas long as you know you need to interpret veracity, and have a basis for judging, you'll be fine and, LLM probabilities-based constructs are unreasonably effective when you suppress the creativity that you don't need in a Q&A for yourself