3 ms·
I think Zig's ReleaseSafe mode is intended to be suitable for production, which IIUC isn't really the case with ASan, UBSan, and friends. Those have some perfor
by oconnor663 4y ago
I think Zig's ReleaseSafe mode is intended to be suitable for production, which IIUC isn't really the case with ASan, UBSan, and friends. Those have some performance problems and also some attack surface problems.
- planede 4y agoOK, but is "safe" in ReleaseSafe any kind of guarantee, or is it just safer than ReleaseFast? I can enable lightweight assertions in libstdc++ and libc++ and it makes C++ safer, but not in any way "safe". There are some flags that can be enabled to trap on some language UB too, without bringing in the heavy weight sanitizers.
- oconnor663 4y agoLast time I checked (more than a year ago) there were major open questions about what could be guaranteed. My impression was that you could expect e.g. all array accesses to be bounds checked, but that use-after-free and dangling pointers were still issues, especially if you use the C allocator.