> I always thought technical debt was a euphemism for speed over quality. For a first pass approximation it is. The post is a soup of manager-speak and blogge

> I always thought technical debt was a euphemism for speed over quality. For a first pass approximation it is. The post is a soup of manager-speak and blogger-speak. I might be too hungover to decipher it properly, but I'm pretty sure it's saying: go back and fix the places you scarified quality in the name of development speed, but only if fixing it will unlock more development speed. (And don't let those shifty fucks sneak in a refactor that doesn't bring any development speed RIO).