4 ms·
You open-sourced your code - isn't this scrutiny exactly what you would want to achieve? Alternatively, I would expect these reports to be reported via your iss
by sveme 4y ago
You open-sourced your code - isn't this scrutiny exactly what you would want to achieve? Alternatively, I would expect these reports to be reported via your issues tracker.
- dangtony98 4y agoYup! We appreciate feedback we can get across all aspects including security but employ a security policy of reporting any security concerns via email - this is pretty standard practice we've seen.
- whylo 4y ago> employ a security policy of reporting any security concerns via email You don't have a security.txt, https://infisical.com/docs/security/overview https://infisical.com/docs/security/overview doesn't mention it and it's not on your FAQ, so I don't blame ianpurton for not finding it. You have a 'Report a vulnerability' issue template on GitHub (https://github.com/Infisical/infisical/security/advisories/new https://github.com/Infisical/infisical/security/advisories/n...) but then your readme points to a security policy which says to email: https://github.com/Infisical/infisical/security/policy https://github.com/Infisical/infisical/security/policy
- dangtony98 4y agoThere are 3 different locations in the GitHub repo regarding the security policy: a SECURITY.md file containing instructions to report security vulnerabilities to team@infisical.com — this is employed in other open core repos like Strapi, PostHog, Chatwoot; a security policy on the sidebar that links to the SECURITY.md; and a security section in our README that also links to the SECURITY.md. There's also an issue template for reporting vulnerabilities as well as you mentioned. That said, we'll add info to the security page in our docs to contact us regarding vulnerabilities. Thanks!
- 1ba9115454 4y agoStandard practice is to do a full security audit before you onboard customers.
- dangtony98 4y agoWe're preparing to do a SOC2 with Vanta first followed by a security audit with some firm like Trail of Bits next. We're fortifying the codebase every day and would expect this process to be complete in the next 2 quarters.
- Implicated 4y ago> the next 2 quarters 6 months? I'm not being sarcastic here - I'm not on the security or enterprise side of things, but this seems like a long way off for something like a secrets manager. Just out of curiosity, what would hold you back from doing this _prior_ to launching?
- vmatsiiako 4y agoI completely agree! I must say though, this is not fully dependent on us! SOC2 is a very lengthy process that also depends on auditors. This is one of our main priorities at the moment.
- dangtony98 4y agoGetting certified is unfortunately not an overnight task … SOC2 alone will likely take months and that’s not yet factoring in the security audit as well. As much as we’d like to have it done ASAP, a lot of it is dependent on the length of the process and requirements to be met - that’s why my estimate is within the next 2 quarters (sooner the better). As an open source company, we’ve basically “launched” since the moment we open sourced the codebase - it’s a constant iteration process for us and every week we release security updates as part of our roadmap. Security certifications and audits are something we’re starting to do in parallel at the moment whilst still being early in our journey (open sourced 3 months ago roughly).