3 ms·
Sure, I personally like the Graviton instances. For workloads that care more about throughput than latency, they offer excellent performance-per-price. The OP
by cldellow 4y ago
Sure, I personally like the Graviton instances. For workloads that care more about throughput than latency, they offer excellent performance-per-price.
The OP was asking what was "most comparable" to Fly's offering. I assumed they meant "what would similar performance cost elsewhere".
By switching from Intel to ARM, they're buying something fundamentally different. Maybe it's a better fit overall! But I didn't understand that to be what they were asking.
- ctvo 4y agoI think we're on the same page. I only wanted to further contrast for readers the difference between something like fly.to and AWS. There's a lot of pros / cons, and one of them is selection. I wasn't sure what the dedicated instances for fly.io were running on (can't find it on this page: https://fly.io/docs/about/pricing/#plans https://fly.io/docs/about/pricing/#plans). To truly do an apples / apples compare there's networking capabilities, storage, and other considerations also.