3 ms·
Some people work in areas where their results are directly tied to their rewards. And those environments are usually rapidly developing, so same results one ye
by j7ake 4y ago
Some people work in areas where their results are directly tied to their rewards.
And those environments are usually rapidly developing, so same results one year later returns smaller rewards.
Therefore, in some areas, one needs to constantly improve in order to deliver better results over time.
A layman's example: you cannot stagnate as an NBA player because the game constantly evolves and one must be to date with the latest tactics and techniques.
Assuming that the same results will give same rewards over an entire career is waiting to be made redundant by advances in the field.
- sublinear 4y ago> Assuming that the same results will give same rewards over an entire career is waiting to be made redundant by advances in the field. True advancements are rare and unevenly distributed. Most workplaces are not following the latest trends, but picking the right tools for the job. Contrary to what many believe, software is only becoming more specialized and complex and it makes perfect sense that it would.
- j7ake 4y agoUnfortunately the demand for those jobs relative to supply is astronomical. So usually competition can be brutal and the pay suboptimal at the top labs.