3 ms·
Isn't that a good thing? I see this as a victory sign of feminism. Women no longer have to live their lives as a second class citizens. Marry > have kids > rais
by unpopularopp 4y ago
Isn't that a good thing? I see this as a victory sign of feminism. Women no longer have to live their lives as a second class citizens. Marry > have kids > raise them etc. This is not the default path anymore and of course than means a lot of men would end up alone. Just a natural balancing and how things should have always been.
- icare_1er 4y agoIf they had "always been that way", by definition, you wouldn't be here, because you (or I, or everyone else) being here is the result of a society producing descendants, which itself is the consequence of a society producing couples.
- throwayyy479087 4y agoThis should be higher. What's good for the individual is not always what's good for society. I know a few "young spinsters" but I also know a ton of happy, successful single women.
- jocaal 4y ago> What's good for the individual is not always what's good for society. Should we not prioritize the society as a whole, compared to the individual? This is like saying its ok to ignore global warming, because my immediate benefit is much more important than the collective health of society.