3 ms·
So relieved to see this comment at the top. After reading OPs second paragraph I was thinking oh, so by 'confusion' he actually means people with different opin
by didntreadarticl 4y ago
So relieved to see this comment at the top. After reading OPs second paragraph I was thinking oh, so by 'confusion' he actually means people with different opinions from him
Taken as a list of biases, the article is useful. It never hurts to be reminded about all the different ways we can be led astray. But the problem is, the list of 'mitigations' boils down to become an investigative journalist who researches _everything_ using multiple viewpoints from primary sources, surrounds themselves with people who disagree with them and engages them in lively dialogue, and remains open minded and neutral about everything until the end of time
Ain't nobody got time for that
We have a limited about of time and energy and need to decide where to spend it. Sometimes it might be more efficient to take received wisdom and run with it rather than launch a research project twenty times a day
- blueflow 4y ago"people with different opinion" is some ideal that i found nice a decade ago. But today i think that the objective facts are pretty well known and most trouble are people who cant differentiate between a fact and their opinion. There are some things that we just cannot possibly know and people love to fill these voids with their imagination.
- AnimalMuppet 4y agoThe objective facts are more well known than they were a decade ago on things that were a question a decade ago. But now we've got new questions. The objective facts on at least some of them are not yet well known, because the questions are too new.