4 ms·

Yes，part of the explanation is probably that women mature a bit earlier than men (in terms of romantic and sexual attractivity).

igetspam 4y ago
So 20-30 year old men are too immature for women to be interested in them? But women of the same age aren't? So should we keep you'd men out of the work force and out of the general population because they're too immature to interact with more reasoned beings? Do you really think that?
- DicIfTEx 4y ago
  I read this whole thing in Tucker Carlson's voice.
  - igetspam 4y ago
    Weird. Tucker Carlson isn't known for thinking women are people. He's more likely to think Incels and Redpills are heros. I can see how it one squints, you could get that as what I'm saying but that's not it. My point is that the "men mature slowly" argument is dumb. There's plenty of evidence to support the idea that women's standards are increasing and men are not improving. Men are alone because we've decided that that the world is the problem, not us and that's unfair.
- geysersam 4y ago
  No of course I don't think that.
  - igetspam 4y ago
    Then what's your argument?
tupolef 4y ago
The fact that women mature earlier is one element, the fact that they seek qualities that men acquire later (stability, resources) is another. But I think that what makes the situation very sad is that our western society has decided to close its eyes to the intrinsic value of women's virtue in the eyes of men. When a young man can't find an interested partner during his younger years and then he is supposed to either fall back on the women over 30 who are left or play on his newly acquired skills as a thirty year old to seduce a woman 10 years younger. In the end, everyone is sad, there are fewer children, society is less virtuous, women change partners throughout their lives, while men wonder if there is any marryable woman left around them.
- bilqis 4y ago
  What virtues you’re talking about?
- igetspam 4y ago
  It's like we're not even reading any more... You didn't read the article. You didn't read the thing you wrote that supports the evidence I'm the article. You don't see how you basically just said you were forced to date 20 year olds in your 30s because women your own age are... what? Something bad or something?

igetspam 4y ago

So 20-30 year old men are too immature for women to be interested in them? But women of the same age aren't? So should we keep you'd men out of the work force and out of the general population because they're too immature to interact with more reasoned beings? Do you really think that?

DicIfTEx 4y ago
I read this whole thing in Tucker Carlson's voice.
- igetspam 4y ago
  Weird. Tucker Carlson isn't known for thinking women are people. He's more likely to think Incels and Redpills are heros. I can see how it one squints, you could get that as what I'm saying but that's not it. My point is that the "men mature slowly" argument is dumb. There's plenty of evidence to support the idea that women's standards are increasing and men are not improving. Men are alone because we've decided that that the world is the problem, not us and that's unfair.
geysersam 4y ago
No of course I don't think that.
- igetspam 4y ago
  Then what's your argument?

tupolef 4y ago

The fact that women mature earlier is one element, the fact that they seek qualities that men acquire later (stability, resources) is another. But I think that what makes the situation very sad is that our western society has decided to close its eyes to the intrinsic value of women's virtue in the eyes of men. When a young man can't find an interested partner during his younger years and then he is supposed to either fall back on the women over 30 who are left or play on his newly acquired skills as a thirty year old to seduce a woman 10 years younger. In the end, everyone is sad, there are fewer children, society is less virtuous, women change partners throughout their lives, while men wonder if there is any marryable woman left around them.

bilqis 4y ago
What virtues you’re talking about?
igetspam 4y ago
It's like we're not even reading any more... You didn't read the article. You didn't read the thing you wrote that supports the evidence I'm the article. You don't see how you basically just said you were forced to date 20 year olds in your 30s because women your own age are... what? Something bad or something?