4 ms·
This is just an advertisement of her "consulting". As for the "innovation", that reminds me of "Ask HN: I’m 41 and still unmarried – what should I do?" where O
by postsantum 4y ago
This is just an advertisement of her "consulting".
As for the "innovation", that reminds me of "Ask HN: I’m 41 and still unmarried – what should I do?" where OP went on dates with 120 men and rejected every single one
- barry-cotter 4y agoI didn’t believe that was real so I searched for it. Very sad. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31961992 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31961992
- bruce343434 4y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31961992 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31961992 721 comments
- raverbashing 4y agoThe top comment there is very on point
- mcv 4y agoAbsolutely. There's definitely a risk in being too picky. You should be somewhat picky; you don't want to date just anyone, do you? But you also need to understand that nobody is perfect. As with job candidates, meeting 50% of the requirements is pretty good. The important part is that they've got enough to interest you, and that their annoyances (everybody has some) is stuff you can tolerate. Of course there are red flags that are immediate dealbreakers; don't tolerate those. But be prepared to find someone who may be completely different from what you may once have dreamt about, but who may still be right for you.
- dragonwriter 4y ago> As with job candidates, meeting 50% of the requirements is pretty good. If a candidate (for anything) meeting 50% of requirements is “pretty good”, whoever created the list of requirements does not understand the concept of requirements.
- mcv 4y agoThat is very often the case.
- AlecSchueler 4y ago> dates with 120 men and rejected every single one Is this very surprising? More and more women are choosing not to date men at all because of the low quality of partnership. Men really don't try very hard in terms of supporting the women around them, from my experience.