3 ms·
> Sadly, Google have co-opted to run RCS (https://jibe.google.com/ https://jibe.google.com/) and most people have now serious doubts if Google will ruin messagi
by pietro72ohboy 4y ago
> Sadly, Google have co-opted to run RCS (https://jibe.google.com/ https://jibe.google.com/) and most people have now serious doubts if Google will ruin messaging again like how they ruined Hangouts.
Even though there’s nuance to this (RCS is a standard but Google’s running their own server with E2E extensions), this statement is a common ruse to deflect the blame onto Google. All modern instant messaging services are centralised. This entire “Google runs RCS” debate is a straw man to deflect blame onto Google. Meanwhile, Apple is the party that doesn’t want anyone plugging into its walled garden.
- kotaKat 4y agoEveryone ran an SMSC (and MMSC) just fine. There was no "centralized" messaging in cellular telephony in the past, just loosely linked carriers. Until now, where suddenly Google seems to be the only RCS operator in town because hardly any carriers want to run their own RCS infrastructure.
- zinekeller 4y ago> All modern instant messaging services are centralised. This entire “Google runs RCS” debate is a straw man to deflect blame onto Google. Meanwhile, Apple is the party that doesn’t want anyone plugging into its walled garden. And this is precisely why. If RCS services were being operated by any other company, even Amazon, there isn't that problem of "what if Google pulled this out again" and RCS might be more palatable to the point that Apple will be forced to integrate it. Instead, Google pushed RCS out because they knew that they screwed up Hangouts hard.