And you hit the struggle right there. Absolute is not the goal, even for free-speech absolutionists. What you define regular speech to be is different to what o

And you hit the struggle right there. Absolute is not the goal, even for free-speech absolutionists. What you define regular speech to be is different to what other people define, and while that might be okay, there is no consensus among any majority or even significant plurality of people about where the actual line between protected and non-protected speech should be.