> The case was about what sort of speech is a type of criminal conduct. the case was decided by the state on basis of "what sort of speech threatens the laws c

> The case was about what sort of speech is a type of criminal conduct. the case was decided by the state on basis of "what sort of speech threatens the laws created by the state" I'm pointing out the difference because science requires questioning, and free speech allows it, but the state and the mob may prefer you to not question state mandates on, oh let's say for example, covid's origins or the hastily prepared novel vaccines or whimsical ever changing masking policies and any measures of their effectiveness