3 ms·
>>We did not have a good debate over the origins of the virus because there was not enough evidence for one. I am not sure I entirely agree. Evidence, or at le
by m348e912 4y ago
>>We did not have a good debate over the origins of the virus because there was not enough evidence for one.
I am not sure I entirely agree. Evidence, or at least theory that the virus was lab-made was vehemently suppressed. I remember Indian researchers presenting their evidence that there were some odd synthetic genome insertions and they were quickly dismissed.
https://www.opindia.com/2021/06/indian-scientists-had-found-unique-insertions-in-covid-19-virus-genome/ https://www.opindia.com/2021/06/indian-scientists-had-found-...
- brucethemoose2 4y agoNevertheless, it should not enter the public domain like that until the scientific/intelligence communities are reasonably sure. Politicans should refrain from hurling childish insults at other nations, and journalists should refrain from publishing withering accusations as news, at least until the confidence is high. Maybe I am misremembering things, but that was more of a norm a decade ago.