3 ms·
> IMHO it should be considered for an "age v2" Definitely, though personally I wouldn't go as far as recommend we make a version 2 just for this. The downsides
by loup-vaillant 4y ago
> IMHO it should be considered for an "age v2"
Definitely, though personally I wouldn't go as far as recommend we make a version 2 just for this. The downsides of such a change are not worth the arguably extremely slim security benefit.
(And I agree with Age author it's not worth warning users about either. Not now in 2023.)
- Retr0id 4y agoRight. I don't think this is a reason alone to make breaking changes, but if a new version is coming out for whatever reason(s), it should be bundled in with the other changes.