3 ms·
Unicode has completely separate rules for characters and emojis. Characters and scripts generally need solid documentation that they are real existing symbols.
by kens 4y ago
Unicode has completely separate rules for characters and emojis. Characters and scripts generally need solid documentation that they are real existing symbols. Emojis, on the other hand, are accepted largely on how likely they are to be used. My impression is that the Unicode committee would prefer to deal with scripts and characters, but they got stuck with emojis for historical reasons and that's what most people care about.
Refs:
https://www.unicode.org/emoji/proposals.html https://www.unicode.org/emoji/proposals.html
http://www.unicode.org/pending/proposals.html http://www.unicode.org/pending/proposals.html
- avgcorrection 4y agoNo, man. Digital communication should follow whatever history for inclusion that text before 1850 did. Write a `:P` (you know: HN and emojis…) as monastic marginalia for three hundred years and then maybe we’ll spare one code point for it.