3 ms·
You’d have to assume a conspiracy among all historians both amateur and professional for that cliche to be true. The people that write history are humans and th
by throwuwu 4y ago
You’d have to assume a conspiracy among all historians both amateur and professional for that cliche to be true. The people that write history are humans and they all behave and believe in different ways. You’ll never find an unbiased version of history whether it’s written by the victors or the defeated.
- dustfinger 4y agoThe word conspiracy has been effectively demonized. The truth is, societal fractions at all levels conspire against one another on a daily basis, from community sport leagues conspiring to form strategies to defeat their rivals to executives in multi-national corporations trying to dominate a global market-space. > You’ll never find an unbiased version of history whether it’s written by the victors or the defeated. That is true. I think being unbiased is extremely difficult. Maybe impossible; I am not sure. Worse yet, there would never be a way of knowing whether something is biased or not.