>You could, and it's going to be one effect or the other that is stronger... And now we know which one. If the result would have been the other way around, we

>You could, and it's going to be one effect or the other that is stronger... And now we know which one. If the result would have been the other way around, we could have had here on NH the same story with the same argument with about the same conclusion. That's not very helpful. Note also the null hypothesis (none of these 'effects' matter, and choice is rather random) has the same non-explanatory potential as the story does.