5 ms·

GitHub eats the payment processor fees, and passes 100% on to developers. Presumably, they were losing too much money here on PayPal.

djbusby 4y ago
PayPal takes ~3% - doesn't Stripe cost roughly the same?
- ensignavenger 4y ago
  Github probably has negotiated better rates. Possibly much better with Stripe than PayPal. However, I think passing on PayPal fees would be a better option, then developers could wncourage sponsors to switch over time so they get more.
  - saurik 4y ago
    I mean, I would hope GitHub isn't using Stripe at their scale, but I could also easily see this happening (them negotiating great rates from Stripe, I mean) at their scale and, particularly, their level of prestige and since it will be used by developers. For anyone else, though: please note that PayPal is cheaper than Stripe, with bulk rates that kick in sooner and support for a special micropayments tier on smaller tickets (though this option isn't quite as good as it used to be; I'm grandfathered in ;P). Stripe frankly gets away with a lot on price simply due to being the "darling" of developers, who don't necessarily check and often refuse to negotiate no matter the cost to their bottom line (see how expensive people assume Akamai is ;P). I was shocked how much Stripe wanted to charge for AliPay, as an example, as if you work with AliPay Global directly (instead of going through Stripe) the cost is 3% with no flat fee, while Stripe decided to keep their $0.30 "I don't know what I am doing I just want it to work" fee.
justinclift 4y ago
PayPal has a pretty shitty reputation too. Perhaps GitHub have been on the receiving end of PayPal doing dodgy shit once too often, and are now going to do something about it.
zild3d 4y ago
Pretty sure maintainers would be happier if GitHub announced they have to start passing on the fee instead of turning off the processor altogether. 97% of the donation vs 0%...

djbusby 4y ago

PayPal takes ~3% - doesn't Stripe cost roughly the same?

ensignavenger 4y ago
Github probably has negotiated better rates. Possibly much better with Stripe than PayPal. However, I think passing on PayPal fees would be a better option, then developers could wncourage sponsors to switch over time so they get more.
- saurik 4y ago
  I mean, I would hope GitHub isn't using Stripe at their scale, but I could also easily see this happening (them negotiating great rates from Stripe, I mean) at their scale and, particularly, their level of prestige and since it will be used by developers. For anyone else, though: please note that PayPal is cheaper than Stripe, with bulk rates that kick in sooner and support for a special micropayments tier on smaller tickets (though this option isn't quite as good as it used to be; I'm grandfathered in ;P). Stripe frankly gets away with a lot on price simply due to being the "darling" of developers, who don't necessarily check and often refuse to negotiate no matter the cost to their bottom line (see how expensive people assume Akamai is ;P). I was shocked how much Stripe wanted to charge for AliPay, as an example, as if you work with AliPay Global directly (instead of going through Stripe) the cost is 3% with no flat fee, while Stripe decided to keep their $0.30 "I don't know what I am doing I just want it to work" fee.

justinclift 4y ago

PayPal has a pretty shitty reputation too. Perhaps GitHub have been on the receiving end of PayPal doing dodgy shit once too often, and are now going to do something about it.

zild3d 4y ago

Pretty sure maintainers would be happier if GitHub announced they have to start passing on the fee instead of turning off the processor altogether. 97% of the donation vs 0%...