4 ms·
It shouldn't. But it should enact rules that govern certain types of goods, like local housing. Housing and rentals are different because unlike most goods, th
by dghlsakjg 4y ago
It shouldn't. But it should enact rules that govern certain types of goods, like local housing.
Housing and rentals are different because unlike most goods, there really isn't a good alternative to not purchasing the good, and because the supply side of the market is necessarily slow, and constrained by geography.
In other words housing in your local area is an entirely different good than housing 100 miles away, and we should recognize that ensuring the opportunity for shelter to all people is a moral necessity higher than ensuring that pleasure travelers can stay in any given place.
We place a mountain of restrictions on real estate in most of the western world. Requiring that housing be used as housing is a pretty reasonable take.
If you think that people should be able to use their property for anything they want, fine, but don't get upset when someone wants to open a 24 hour go kart track nextdoor.