3 ms·
Realizing that most often when we discuss the speed of light we’re not actually discussing the speed of light, but rather the speed of causality, was a huge eye
by rhaway84773 4y ago
Realizing that most often when we discuss the speed of light we’re not actually discussing the speed of light, but rather the speed of causality, was a huge eye opener for me.
The speed of light is not always c. That’s why refraction happens. Because light slows down in certain mediums below c. It’s kid of a coincidence that the speed of light happens to be c in a vacuum (actually I’m not sure about this…maybe there’s an organic reason why electromagnetic waves will be c in a vacuum that is fundamental).
I do think it’s interesting that as humans our primary sense is to light which does happen to travel at c. I wonder how different our species would be if we couldn’t sense waves traveling at c, and for example, were only capable of detecting sound.
Alternatively it may be that a species which could not sense waves traveling at c would not be capable of becoming as sophisticated as humans.
- Matumio 4y agoDangerous speculation. One day, you will either step into a dark room and get eaten by a grue, or be killed by a gigantic bat who overheard your comment about her intellect. More seriously, I don't think speed-of-light has much biological relevance. It has consequences for microchips, though.