4 ms·

That would increase the cost of the phone, since they would have to support and test the phone long past the expected lifetime. But, this is marketed as a budge

• thepangolino 4y ago
  That’s why he said paid for.
  • IncRnd 4y ago
    This is a budget phone, so there are very few people who would purchase extended security support after three years. There certainly won't be enough to cover the business costs for keeping the support and testing of an old crufty phone used by few people. It's unsustainable to put the costs on the backend, so phone's price would have to be raised to cover those extended security updates. But, that won't happen for a budget phone. There just won't be enough people willing to pay after three years. That's the problem with purchasing a budget phone. You get what you pay for, a phone that will go away soon.
• atleta 4y ago
  Unless the price of the upgrades cover the support. Yes, of course, it would be a gamble, because nobody can predict what the demand would be in 3-4-5 years. But I wonder whether they could reduce the cost with smart software engineering (i.e whether they could compel themselves to do smarter software engineering by promising paid upgrades) or whether they could make a promise to make paid upgrades OR open sourcing the code for the components that will be different from the newer versions. (I.e. mainly the hardware drivers.) Yes, I know licensing issues may indeed pose problems for third party components.