4 ms·
Gorbachev definitely did not envision it, but he certainly wasn't going to start killing tens and hundreds of thousands of people over it. There's a reason his
by vkou 4y ago
Gorbachev definitely did not envision it, but he certainly wasn't going to start killing tens and hundreds of thousands of people over it.
There's a reason his legacy is that of a persona-non-grata in today's Russia.
- radicaldreamer 4y agoTo be fair, Yeltsin and the Russian nationalists were fine with letting these countries go their own way and breaking up the Soviet Union as a way of getting an independent Russia as a consequence. Their problem was always the suppression of Russian nationalism in the Soviet Union.
- syzarian 4y agoHe sought to prevent Lithuanian independence. His legacy is tarnished because Russia lost influence while he was leader of the Soviet Union. Putin’s approval rating increases when he intervened, invades, or annexes territory of Russia’s neighbors. Russians will tolerate a lot provided their national prestige is not tarnished. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_Events_(Lithuania) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_Events_(Lithuania)
- vkou 4y ago> He sought to prevent Lithuanian independence. He also sought for the party to remain in power, but when push came to shove, didn't turn to the old playbook of violence and repression.
- syzarian 4y agoHence is disapproval amongst Russians. Russians don’t give the moniker “great” to humanitarians.