3 ms·
The person I was responding to was specifically and narrowly saying that the plugins and software were the benefit, not having the clicky button. They were sayi
by saurik 4y ago
The person I was responding to was specifically and narrowly saying that the plugins and software were the benefit, not having the clicky button. They were saying this in response to someone who didn't want a clicky button anymore and had actively given up on using a clicky button, so they were defending the product on the merit of something that explicitly wasn't the clicky button: that having to recreate the software would be hard, and so that's why I guess that other user should buy and use a clicky button even though they realized they didn't really want to have to carry around a clicky button. If what matters to YOU is the clicky button, and you are in a good position to use the clicky button, great!! I have no issue with that, and I purposefully did not reply to anyone else who wanted such, as that is a consistent position. In fact, if someone had asked me "why do people use this product?", I would have said "many people want a clicky button, and so this company makes the clickiest of clicky buttons". But... how does anything you said here have anything to do with the context of the comment I was replying to, which explicitly was trying to sell someone who didn't want a clicky button on the idea that "the power of stream deck" is its software? :(