3 ms·
Sadly, we can't have browsers that use SRV records.
by exabrial 4y ago
Sadly, we can't have browsers that use SRV records.
- teddyh 4y agoHTTPS records are (reportedly) coming soon™: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https... TL;DR: HTTPS records are like SRV records without the weight number (but, crucially, including the priority number), and with some extra stuff to make the TLS handshake happier.
- exabrial 4y agonice! thanks for the link, that gives me hope
- d110af5ccf 4y agoNote that there are both HTTPS and SVCB record types. Regardless of the standard being finalized there's already some support in the wild. To name a few prominent ones iOS, macOS, Cloudflare, Akamai, and NS1 all support both types. https://github.com/MikeBishop/dns-alt-svc/blob/main/svcb-implementations.md https://github.com/MikeBishop/dns-alt-svc/blob/main/svcb-imp...
- teddyh 4y ago> Note that there are both HTTPS and SVCB record types. Yes, but the topic was web browsers, which would use the HTTPS record, not the SVCB one.