2 ms·
I’m specifically referring to the lack of aesthetic details. For instance, IFR charts (https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/productcatalog/IFRCh
by ericpauley 4y ago
I’m specifically referring to the lack of aesthetic details.
For instance, IFR charts (https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/productcatalog/IFRCharts/LowAltitude/ https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/productc...) show just essential routing information.
Here’s an example taxi diagram: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aip_html/part3_ad_2.0_new_york.html https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aip_html...
Again the key point I’m highlighting is lack of extraneous aesthetic.
The view is even more similar to that used by ATC: https://atctower.com/what-the-atc-controller-sees-tech-in-the-tower/ https://atctower.com/what-the-atc-controller-sees-tech-in-th...
If you’ve ridden a lot in planes, you may be used to looking at VFR sectionals (https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/productcatalog/VFRCharts/Sectional/ https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/productc...). These have more aesthetic detail precisely because they’re intended for visual navigation.