4 ms·
As per your blog, your test is n=1. Besides, if people can really accurately count their calorie intakes and won’t overeat what they use up, then it is thermody
by kaba0 4y ago
As per your blog, your test is n=1. Besides, if people can really accurately count their calorie intakes and won’t overeat what they use up, then it is thermodynamically impossible not to lose weight. It is really hard to do in practice, especially for longer periods of time, but the theory behind is sound and straightforward.
- exfatloss 4y agoThis is the experience of practically everyone who's ever tried to lose weight, not just me. You think we had an obesity epidemic that's growing if counting calories really worked? > Besides, if people can really accurately count their calorie intakes and won’t overeat what they use up, then it is thermodynamically impossible not to lose weight. This is false. The body is a self-regulating system. You eat less, the body can just burn less. You eat more, the body can burn more. What you eat and what you do also plays a huge role.
- kaba0 4y agoIt ain’t going to burn less than like 2000 calories. We are just surprisingly efficient at turning food into energy, and too efficient to burn enough energy with even hard-core movements. And it doesn’t hurt your last point in anyway, both statements can be true.
- exfatloss 4y agoIt absolutely will. I've tried it myself and stayed stable around 1,000kcal/day for 2 months straight.