4 ms·
For those reading and do not get the reference, here it is: Infineon is a company that makes “secure elements”. In 2017, Infineon announced that the key-gener
by CaliforniaKarl 4y ago
For those reading and do not get the reference, here it is:
Infineon is a company that makes “secure elements”.
In 2017, Infineon announced that the key-generation component of their chips was making RSA keys in a way that could be exploited[1]. Yubico had these secure elements in some of their Yubikey products. In the affected products, it affected key generation for PGP and PKCS#11 keys[2].
Affected customers could self-identify by checking their YubiKey model, firmware version, and how they were using it. If they were affected, they could apply for a free replacement. This was implemented by Yubico sending the affected customer a code to ‘buy’ a free Yubikey from the store.
I remember the vulnerability being widely-publicized at the time. The only communications I got from Yubico, if any, were an email asking me to do the check. They did not randomly send me a Yubikey.
1: https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/promopages/rsa-update/ https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/promopages/rsa-updat...
2: https://www.yubico.com/support/issue-rating-system/security-advisories/ysa-2017-01/ https://www.yubico.com/support/issue-rating-system/security-...
- neilv 4y agoMy first thought was in response to the title "How to weaponize the Yubikey", and the opening sentence, as if that's what gave the writer the inspiration. When the article didn't go there, I still thought that idea was also interesting. All the downvotes since you posted your comment suggest that maybe some people then thought I had been criticizing the writer's opsec. But I wasn't, I respect the article, and I should've been more clear.