3 ms·
How is it vague? > Lessors must communicated to a RealPage pricing advisor that they have accepted or confirmed the approved pricing Okay, so the Lessor is di
by ketzo 4y ago
How is it vague?
> Lessors must communicated to a RealPage pricing advisor that they have accepted or confirmed the approved pricing
Okay, so the Lessor is directly communicating with a RealPage employee.
>If Lessors wish to diverged from the approved pricing they must submit reasoning for doing so and await approval
How could this same Lessor be getting approval from anyone other than that employee?
- vel0city 4y ago> How could this same Lessor be getting approval from anyone other than that employee? Because it tells you who the dispute gets escalated to in that next paragraph, and it's not that RP employee. > If there is a disagreement between the participating Lessor and the RealPage Pricing Advisor, the dispute is often elevated to the Lessor’s management for resolution If the employee has permissions to just set the price, they can just set the price. If they don't, which a lot don't, the dispute gets sent to their manager who does have the rights to set the prices. RP knows there's a disagreement on the price, so they can update their models and understand why the property disagrees with the generated prices, but they're not directly enforcing their generated prices. They do strongly encourage the generated prices though and do pressure the property to stick to the price, but ultimately it does not require approval from the RP employee.