3 ms·
I'm completely clueless about "supply chain optimisation" but I wonder whether it involves more automated processes, than human beings? I'm asking, because the
by YeGoblynQueenne 4y ago
I'm completely clueless about "supply chain optimisation" but I wonder whether it involves more automated processes, than human beings?
I'm asking, because the article does focus on tools used to predict human behaviour (as I think you note as you say it focuses on a different area).
Predicting human behaviour is hard. I imagine that it's far easier to predict the behaviour of an artificial system, or a process, whose rules are (... more or less ... ) known. For example, I imagine that predicting, say, the rate of defects of a certain product coming out of some factory's production line, is not that hard to do -given enough data etc.
And then, most of the time there's probably many fewer ethical and social issues to consider in such cases. I'm saying probably! Since I don't know the subject at all. But it's clear that there are social issues in, e.g., predicting recidivism or making automated decisions about taking children into foster care.
- tikhonj 4y agoI was working in retail, which means we were trying to forecast human behavior—how much of a given item people would want to buy at some time—but we only cared about that behavior in aggregate, not at the level of individual people. That definitely makes it qualitatively different to the sorts of prediction and optimization that the paper talks about.
- YeGoblynQueenne 4y agoThanks. I guess I get a black hole for a faulty assumption (a star for a right guess?).