The «Turing test» cannot be interpreted as a suggestion that trickery fits the purpose (of replacing actual, real properties). The "Imitation game" was introdu

The «Turing test» cannot be interpreted as a suggestion that trickery fits the purpose (of replacing actual, real properties). The "Imitation game" was introduced in the context of an explicitly very relaxed interpretation of "thinking" - broad to encompass the criticism of superficial cultural positions - in the question "«Can machines think?»". The "Imitation game" has the purpose of deciding that "we could say that machines can think in a shallow sense of the term", for the purpose of stating a positive (positively negative) idea that "we cannot exclude that machines can potentially think". This does not make a "fooling" machine intelligent.