> but even scientific journals will not accept the results. What? What are you talking about? Why would a scientific journal not accept it, if it's a properly

> but even scientific journals will not accept the results. What? What are you talking about? Why would a scientific journal not accept it, if it's a properly done study that contradicts recent results? Furthermore, there are plenty of "water is wet" studies that get published all the time—some of which are confirming things we "know", but don't have solid scientific data on, others of which are doing replications of existing studies. (I suppose you probably wouldn't get much traction with studies that rehash very old, many-times-replicated results...) I don't think scientific journals work the way you think they do.