3 ms·
Yep. Probably as a field in employee records API, DBMS, and/or business rules processor as a synthetic attribute called "legal_hold" to combine requirements of
by 1letterunixname 4y ago
Yep. Probably as a field in employee records API, DBMS, and/or business rules processor as a synthetic attribute called "legal_hold" to combine requirements of all legal cases and jurisdictions.
Every system and process that could potentially delete data needs to check "legal_hold".
One of many fun feature requirements of enterprise software that aren't necessarily needed at smaller scales.
- amluto 4y agoThere’s a big company called Google that, among other things, sells enterprise services, and they have a list of their apps that support litigation holds: https://support.google.com/vault/answer/6127699?hl=en https://support.google.com/vault/answer/6127699?hl=en And lo and behold, Chat supports it. edit: as pointed out elsewhere, there is some documentation that “off-the-record” chats are exempt: https://support.google.com/vault/answer/7664657 https://support.google.com/vault/answer/7664657 That seems odd to me. Off-the-record is essentially a retention rule set on a per-chat basis. A hold should override a retention policy.
- 1letterunixname 4y agoIf we used it, we would never allow OTR. Heck, we don't even allow chats in third party apps like Zoom.
- ajb 4y agoWhat's amusing is that it also automatically converts all the Google Doc files to word format, because Lawyers Use Word.
- DenisM 4y agoI presume you meant a refcount, not a Boolean?