4 ms·
You would have to quantify why less work being done is an inherently bad thing to humanity.
by waboremo 4y ago
You would have to quantify why less work being done is an inherently bad thing to humanity.
- snapcaster 4y agoWhat? No you don't. Each individual firm uses their own metrics to decide these things. How would one even measure or quantify a "bad thing to humanity"?
- waboremo 4y agoContext is important. What's being discussed is general work week trials, and the idea that nobody would publish a paper that demonstrates working less = decline in work done. Individual firm metrics are useless to even bring up here.
- HEmanZ 4y ago(Almost) No one would argue that working less for the same exact output is worse than working more. That flies in the face of the most basic ideas in economics. The question is finding the balance, work that produces productive things people value. And it turns out, free market economic systems are pretty good at democratically converging on answer.
- corbulo 4y agoCan you define what that means without using socioeconomic-class terms?
- waboremo 4y agoWhat purpose does that serve when this is a socioeconomic discussion?