Everything you're saying is completely different from a duel. Generally, a conflict is resolved with words and arguments. Only when that doesn't work, it's tak

Everything you're saying is completely different from a duel. Generally, a conflict is resolved with words and arguments. Only when that doesn't work, it's taken before a judge, where it's still resolved with words and arguments, but with a neutral and binding arbiter deciding who's right. After that, the conflict is resolved. No violence necessary. Only when one party violates that already legally binding resolution, come a lot more steps before violence may come in, but at no point do the people involved in the conflict themselves have to resort to violence. There's nothing admirable about having to resort to violence. It's a sign of failure.