4 ms·
Indeed. And furthermore, I notice that most criticism of these systems focuses on their lack of factual coherence and accuracy, ignoring their real incredible p
by inciampati 4y ago
Indeed. And furthermore, I notice that most criticism of these systems focuses on their lack of factual coherence and accuracy, ignoring their real incredible power of translation. Give concepts in any structure or language, at any level of coherency, and you can get out clear code, prose, or poetry that represents exactly the input.
Ask for a biography of a random public figure without giving notes and there is 0 chance they will provide an accurate result. This may mean we need systems that are literally memories without the noise driven generalization, and that these need to be exposed to the said LLMs as a resource. It's not insurmountable and it certainly isn't tulips.
- pwinnski 4y ago> ignoring their real incredible power of translation. I feel like everybody commenting on this thread ought to have to write "it's text completion, not intelligence" on a chalkboard 500 times or so first.