3 ms·
Well, let's start with the idea of “I wish I could invest in YouTube without investing in the rest of it”. Why not? YouTube is a more focused brand, with a wor
by cm277 4y ago
Well, let's start with the idea of “I wish I could invest in YouTube without investing in the rest of it”. Why not? YouTube is a more focused brand, with a world-beating product that's already active in multiple high-growth verticals (entertainment, shorts/vertical video, education, conspiracy theories). As the article says it can compete against both Netflix and TikTok (and probably Udemy, etc.). Aren't these high-growth areas worth investing in? aren't they more high-growth than whatever Google is doing this week? (I don't know, streaming video games to a watch and a new chat application probably).
And if you are investing in these areas and this is your only business isn't this "focus" all of a sudden important? (so you can actually compete in these businesses and potentially grow the business more?).
I for one like the idea --as well as I think Google needs to be broken up ten years ago. YouTube has scale, a good brand and would probably gain by being less Googley --i.e. iterative and consumer-focused. Not just YouTube, but the internet would be better off with a more focused YouTube (that also has less of your personal data as a bonus).
- jfengel 4y agoIs Alphabet lacking cash? Unless a spun-off YouTube were to issue more stock, they don't really care what investors would like. If Alphabet needs money for YouTube investment they can issue more Alphabet stock, and investors can take that deal or not. But I doubt that Alphabet's challenges involve cash flow. It might well be better for the world if Alphabet weren't a conglomerate. But it seems unlikely that it's better for them.
- jpadkins 4y agoAlphabet cash on hand for 2022 was $113.762B, a 18.54% decline from 2021.
- insane_dreamer 4y ago_Only_ $113B? Ouch. /s
- cmeacham98 4y ago> Well, let's start with the idea of “I wish I could invest in YouTube without investing in the rest of it”. Why not? The preceding parts of the comment literally explain why not.
- ok_dad 4y ago"Because it's hard" is no answer.
- ketzo 4y agoYou're not wrong to say it, but describing conspiracy theories as a "high-growth vertical" kinda makes my stomach hurt