I agree with that the books "should be allowed to fade away", not changed if people judge them to be offensive, as it's said in the article. It doesn't sit rig

I agree with that the books "should be allowed to fade away", not changed if people judge them to be offensive, as it's said in the article. It doesn't sit right to me that there is someone owning the rights of the deceased author's work and should try to profit maximize the catalog. That is kind of what is happening here, trying to change the text to sell a slightly different book. It is their incentive to try to keep their sales alive, but it feels like an artificial thing. I guess I'm not used to how this particular sausage is made.