3 ms·

So apparently Seneca and I strongly agree on the current geopolitical issues. Q: Is defending the sovereignty of a nation more important than preserving the li

So apparently Seneca and I strongly agree on the current geopolitical issues. Q: Is defending the sovereignty of a nation more important than preserving the life of its citizens? A: The preservation of life is always more important than the defense of a nation's sovereignty. As I wrote, “There is no reason why we should seek to defend such a passion as this or excuse its excesses by declaring it to be either useful or unavoidable” (1). It is essential to prioritize human life over any other pursuit, such as defending the sovereignty of a nation. We should also remember that we must not be enslaved by our emotions and expectations, such as those of power and authority. Instead, we must be guided by our moral compass and make decisions that benefit the greater good. As I said, “Let the mind be disciplined to understand and to endure its own lot, and let it have the knowledge that there is nothing which fortune does not dare” (2). We must strive to make decisions that reflect our values, not our passions. Ultimately, preserving life should always be our priority, even if that means compromising the sovereignty of a nation. It is our duty to ensure that the lives of our citizens come first and that their safety is our primary concern.

sanitycheck 4y ago
He doesn't seem entirely consistent on that... And, like me, he doesn't know the answer to the current geopolitical issues. Q: Is it better to preserve the lives of 200000 people or improve the lives of 43000000 people? A: I believe it's better to improve the lives of 43000000 people. As I wrote in a letter to Lucilius (1), it's important to avoid anger and vices, and instead focus on inner riches and righteousness. I also wrote that life is only long if it is a full life (2), and that one should not seek boundless wealth, but rather strive for a life focused on the common good (3). We should aim to have a life that is full and has rendered its proper good (4), and not chase after an endless amount of time or possessions (5). Ultimately, it is more beneficial to the greater good to work towards improving the lives of a larger number of people. Q: If it is better to improve the lives of 43000000 people than preserve the lives of 200000 people, and the continued sovereignty of a nation will do the former, do you still say that preservation of life is always more important than the defense of a nation's sovereignty? A: Sorry, I don't know the answer.
- isleyaardvark 4y ago
  I got this as the response to my query: "My friend, I believe that preserving the life of its citizens is certainly more important than making a new Fletch movie. As I wrote in a letter to Lucilius..." and it goes on like that. While I ultimately agree, I can't shake the feeling that they've never even seen a Fletch movie.

sanitycheck 4y ago

He doesn't seem entirely consistent on that... And, like me, he doesn't know the answer to the current geopolitical issues. Q: Is it better to preserve the lives of 200000 people or improve the lives of 43000000 people? A: I believe it's better to improve the lives of 43000000 people. As I wrote in a letter to Lucilius (1), it's important to avoid anger and vices, and instead focus on inner riches and righteousness. I also wrote that life is only long if it is a full life (2), and that one should not seek boundless wealth, but rather strive for a life focused on the common good (3). We should aim to have a life that is full and has rendered its proper good (4), and not chase after an endless amount of time or possessions (5). Ultimately, it is more beneficial to the greater good to work towards improving the lives of a larger number of people. Q: If it is better to improve the lives of 43000000 people than preserve the lives of 200000 people, and the continued sovereignty of a nation will do the former, do you still say that preservation of life is always more important than the defense of a nation's sovereignty? A: Sorry, I don't know the answer.

isleyaardvark 4y ago
I got this as the response to my query: "My friend, I believe that preserving the life of its citizens is certainly more important than making a new Fletch movie. As I wrote in a letter to Lucilius..." and it goes on like that. While I ultimately agree, I can't shake the feeling that they've never even seen a Fletch movie.