It seems to me that the most effective solutions might well be not very splashy at all. If people can easily find content they would like (that are controlled

It seems to me that the most effective solutions might well be not very splashy at all. If people can easily find content they would like (that are controlled by those that are not bent on attacking the people - so like the crazy behavior we see supported by the large hollywood distributors) they will watch it. They will substitute it for content they would watch that funds the anti-society behavior now funded by those watching "Hollywood" and big label music. I am not so anti-Hollywood that I will not watch some great show (yet). But I would certainly favor content that isn't paying for anti-society efforts. If there were good ways to discover content I would like and note what is managed by those that respect society instead of those that don't I would use it. I would pretty easily just chose to try out stuff that is not going to support those that will use income to attack society. I doubt I would boycot anything from those anti-society organization (yet). But even if we just carve off a portion and build up those that produce entertainment for society while respecting us that is a good thing. And I believe if it started the power would build upon itself. Those engaging in bad behavior would lose in the marketplace and likely adjust behavior. Maybe they wouldn't - in which case as we build up good alternative entertainment we can just drop dealing with their organizations altogether.