I want to imagine that hardware engineering follows better practices than software engineering: - no stupid sprints - no agile So, if a new "feature" needs t

I want to imagine that hardware engineering follows better practices than software engineering: - no stupid sprints - no agile So, if a new "feature" needs to be implemented at the hardware level, then all the time needed will be spent thinking about the problem, the design to be applied, the architecture of the design... and only when everything is crystal clear and all the relevant aspects have been assessed (performance, cost, efficiency, etc.) then the implementation can start. Compare that to the "sprint circus" software developers are part of: almost no time for long-term thinking, everything has to be done within the sprint (usually 2 weeks), "move fast and break things".