2 ms·
> So take using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. It is worse. Encryption does protect children instead of endangering them. So these "charities" aren't even doin
by raxxorraxor 4y ago
> So take using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
It is worse. Encryption does protect children instead of endangering them. So these "charities" aren't even doing their job.
- cnity 4y agoIndeed: it is worthwhile to note the nefarious absence of the role of privacy in the laid out "risk assessment" of children's usage of a service, in part 3, chapter 2, point (6) of the bill. https://bills.parliament.uk/publications/49376/documents/2822 https://bills.parliament.uk/publications/49376/documents/282...
- thallium205 4y agoThese “charities” are all funded by government grants anyway. You can safely claim they are both the same entity: the government.
- clnq 4y agoYes. I don't want to live in a world where my kid sends someone a picture of immigrants on a boat and gets a criminal record. It's just a step between abolishing encryption and this. And the next step is wide scope censorship like that instituted by the CCP. The ideas that we should censor politically inconvenient truths like the migrant crisis are already in the UK.