I used to follow a blog (possibly retraction watch? I can't remember now) where they would go through basic biology papers and find photoshopped/edited images a

I used to follow a blog (possibly retraction watch? I can't remember now) where they would go through basic biology papers and find photoshopped/edited images and ask the author about them. Sometimes this would lead to retractions etc. They did mention other people had tried and failed to build tools for this, but the current state of the art was drinking-a-coffee-and-looking-at-it-real-hard. This was before the current explosion of AI, so maybe it's different now? Anyone else able to chime in? Edit: Found it! https://scienceintegritydigest.com https://scienceintegritydigest.com