4 ms·

For reasons having nothing to do with ownership structure, so that doesn't seem as relevant.

• lmm 4y ago
  It's all related. Maybe that kind of disgraceful behaviour is less likely when the company is closely identified with an individual whose reputation is at stake (whether that's Dalio, Bower or anyone else), and so a pattern where companies close up as that person retires rather than becoming enduring standalone brands would be better for society.
  • uoaei 4y ago
    A whole lot of supposition and not a whole lot of substance.
    • lmm 4y ago
      I'm not saying it's necessarily the case, I'm saying it's possible. You can't just assert that ownership structure has nothing to do with it without evidence for that.
    • miguelazo 4y ago
      Sounds like a McKinsey report!