I think this as well - putting the proverbial 'money where my mouth is' by starting a company around it [0]. The signals one can get from a 'BCI' are quite magi

I think this as well - putting the proverbial 'money where my mouth is' by starting a company around it [0]. The signals one can get from a 'BCI' are quite magical. BCI is in quotes, because I, like CTRL-Labs, base the term loosely around non-obvious control to bystanders around you (no vocalization, no obvious hand movements, etc). Extending the idea here: but much of the world is context based. Kitchens house a few main functions across cultures - where I would bet money that on a 'invocation count' metric for GoogleHome/Siri, the highest ranked function is the simple timer. If BCI companies finally got this around their heads (yes), then the skies clear. That's what we think, and what we prove with some pretty insane results. The common refrain from experts in the field is 'well your metric is only one bit' - and to that I say, 'well, yes, but it's the key to acting within the context.' There's a lot of ink I could spill about this; but I'm excited by everyone getting it so wrong. It just proves with time we will get this right. The only sad part is I have no idea how it truly turns into the empire that is the personal computer distribution model through AppStores. But honestly, I don't care - the user stories are gobsmacking. And to add to your hot take, here's a bit more: AR won't be glasses or contacts. It will be DynamicLands + Interactive Projection Mappings of the world. Wearing your compute will be seen like mainframes with mini wheels - oh cute, but I think you're missing the point. [0] An old demo of the first embodiments of this idea: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUbJl_xiDFU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUbJl_xiDFU