3 ms·

Edit: deleting comment due to the worthlessness of dealing with someone who is intentionally engaging in bad faith. I can't argue against intentional misphrasi

• deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
• chowchowchow 4y ago
  You refuse to outline what you mean by due process, and only point to the constitution. Just name a standard, man. "Any concept of due process" is meaningless if the only reference you're able to produce is the constitution. Is that the problem? You can only reference the constitution because it's the only example you're familiar with?
• dragonwriter 4y ago
  > But, I think it is self evidently clear, to most people, that the principle of due process is something that matters outside of just this singular extreme circumstance of the government sending people to jail. Yes, that’s why, e.g., the Constitution requires due process from government generally (see Amendments 5 and 14), not just in the criminal sphere. But the 6th Amendment confrontation clause right is not the same thing as due process.
• chowchowchow 4y ago
  Alright bud. I see the self righteous ego defense. Good luck to ya.