True, it was definitely simplified. But yeah, in cases where you really care, there's a bunch of options to do it completely/sufficiently in sync. (A true async

True, it was definitely simplified. But yeah, in cases where you really care, there's a bunch of options to do it completely/sufficiently in sync. (A true asynchronous sample rate converter, as it would have to be here, might be a bit expensive, but simple interpolation, or even stuffing/dropping, might be sufficient for this particular use case.)