5 ms·
Such extreme privilege right here. Kids that young will be pressured into using drugs and committing crimes, mostly vandalism and theft, but sometimes worse. T
by geraldwhen 4y ago
Such extreme privilege right here. Kids that young will be pressured into using drugs and committing crimes, mostly vandalism and theft, but sometimes worse.
That’s around the age when kids started dealing drugs where I grew up. I knew kids who threw bricks through windows and huffed paint when left alone.
Bad areas are bad.
- junofan 4y agoCome on, it’s not extreme privilege. No gang is recruiting at 6.
- geraldwhen 4y agoI don’t know if it was gang affiliated but other 6 year olds were dealing where I grew up.
- nemothekid 4y ago>Kids that young will be pressured into using drugs and committing crimes This is DARE level propoganda. What person is spending real money to give a 6 year old drugs?
- ethbr0 4y agoAltruists?
- uoaei 4y agoWhere was this, and what convinces you this is widespread enough for concern? This entire article is about rebuffing the "it happened once somewhere so it might happen anywhere" scare tactic that people use to prosecute well-meaning parents for letting their children experience independence.
- gowld 4y agoWhy should it be a crime for a parent to allow there child in the same public where criminals operate? Why should the police punish the victims of crimes for the police's failure to do their one job?
- A4ET8a8uTh0 4y ago<< Such extreme privilege right here. I hate to say this, but this is an amazing lack of imagination over what could happen ( based merely on what did happen before and not coming up with wild scenarios ). I am saying this as a likely free range parent ( still internally debating, but a lot will depend on how my kid handles things ).
- ethbr0 4y agoThe underlying problem is the same as the lottery: the human brain adjusts probability on the basis of severity. Terrible things happen. They aren't likely to happen.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 4y agoYou are definitely onto something. Humans are horrible at estimating risk, but are forced to do it all the time. In some cases, it is a very clear miscalculation resulting in overdoing it one way or another. Sometimes it is just dumb luck. << Terrible things happen. They aren't likely to happen. I think this is the wrong way of looking at this. Most people believe that lightning does not strike people that often. This does not give one has carte blanche to prance around the backyard with a metal rod. Or, to use less crazy example, my street is relatively quiet and slow. And yet, I still look both ways crossing the street, because you never really know. Individual disposition and approach affects statistics.
- mirchibajji 4y agoGoing back to the context of the thread: Not every risk has to be codified into the law, or enforced by the government. Should we make it illegal to prance around with a metal rod in their own backyard, just in case? Making a risk illegal does not magically improve safety, and there is a non-zero probability of the "enforcement" making things worse.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 4y agoI am with you and, in a sense, you are preaching to the choir. If system setup was up to me, maybe with few notable exceptions, all new laws would require a sunset provision to force bad laws out of existence. I am certainly not arguing that just making things illegal improves safety ( and even when it does, I am not stoked about it ).